June 9, 2005

DVD- Jon

DVD-Jon, or Jon Johansen has done more than cracking DVDs, he has cracked iTunes DRM (digital rights managment) technology. (Blog on DRM here) This means that if you have this program you can buy and download the music from Apple’s iTune store without DRM or the restrictions, and use it as you want. The new program is called PyMusique (no it’s not a link to the program), and iTunes has tried to modify their stores to lock out the first version of the program. However, the program has been updated to go around Apples lock out. Jon Johansen also claim to be close to crack Napsters online store’s DRM, which won’t be popular with Windows and Microsoft. It seems that DVD-Jon likes playing with the big boys..

Jon Johansen got famous all over the world when he developed and distributed a program that copies DVD movies when he was 15. Not only that, he also defeated The Motion Picture Association of America, who was representing Hollywood companies like; Walt Disney Co, Universal Studios and Warner Bros in The Oslo district court. The ruling said that prosecutors had not proven that Johansen’s program, DeCSS, had been used for illegal copying of DVDs, and according to Norwegain law he was entitled to make a copy of legally purchased DVDs (a law that now is been rewritten..look at this blog), more on the trial here.
DVD-Jon also won the appeal, before the Norwegian police had to give up.

It is predicted that it won’t be long before Apple realise that they can’t win the code dueling, and make their lawers sue Mr Johansen. Hopefully Mr Johansen will be as succesful as last time he was in legal trouble, even if Norway is changing it’s laws.

Immortality

According to the Futurologist Ian Pearson we can by 2050 have tricked death and will by help of technology have immortality?

Ian Pearson predicts;
“If you draw the timelines, realistically by 2050 we would expect to be able to download your mind into a machine, so when you die it’s not a major career problem,”

This means that if I stay healthy and live a normal life, I and my generation could be immortal. If I’m poor I probably have to wait untill 2075 or 2080, which makes it less likely for me to achive eternal life. This is for me is serious stuff, and even if I’m not sure that Mr Pearson is right, according to himeself he is in 90% av his predictions (have a look at his CV), It means that I have to take a stand for or against immortality and decide if I want it or not. That is really an abusrb thought.

As a futurologist it is Mr Pearsons job to make predictions about the future for his employer, BT. And immortality isn’t his only prediction; in the next 45 years we will get aeroplans that are afraid of crashing and intelligent yoghurt. The Observer In the near future we have to expect the Playstation 3 to be launched and that will according to Mr Pearson be 35 times more powerful as previuos game consoles, and have the capacity that equal 1% of the human mind.

Then from Playstation 3 the computers will evolve and in 2050, they will have the same capacity as a human brain. It freaks me out, in some way it is a good thing, in other terrifying. I know it shouldn’t but it makes me think of the movie The Matrix, where the technology that we human creates becomes to smart and takes over the humans posisionon Earth. Will Technology be the end of humans, and are the limits for how far we can go? Most civilized countries have forbidden experiments with cloning of humans, but what will they do with the possibilty to download a human brain on a computer chip or on a disk?

Interactivity and documentaries

Butch aka Travis :: whats up doco :: June :: 2005

Butch, or Travis as his real name is, just put on a good blog on interactive documentary.

To sum it up, he says that a traditional documentary can be interactive even if it don’t require the viewer to press a button or particepate in any phisycal way. A documentary that makes you think, feel and get engage is as interactive as any other documnetary.

I couldn’t agree more. Not that I have anything against ineractivity and pressing buttons. However, to really understand and engage in a story I think you have to keep it simple and consentrate on understanding the issue.

Again we are talking about new media technology and how to use it in a way that will be accepted and will work to the benfit of the general public. My opinon is that interactivety is very effective in an educational way, and if you make an interactive documentary, it is not only to tell a story, but to educate someone on the topic.

I had to do the same assignments as Butch referes to in his blog, and Kim and me did chose to approach it a little different by mixing the educational and the doco story telling into one project. We made a proposal for a Aussie Rules doco, with in depth interviews of players and other characters but also with training and diet instructions and tips.

Even if interactivity is suppose to be fun, I think we have to give the viewer a reason to rewind or watch the same scene over and over, not just the possibility to get to another path in the story, who wants to look for something if there isn’t anything it for them…?

I’m also a fan of documentary with a point of view approach and only tell the story from one side (Terrorists, a point of view doco from one of my favourite film creaters, Lucas Moodysson). It can make a documentary more emotional however, I like to see some one able to do a point of view doco with interactivity, I think it would be hard to make it as interesting as a traditional one.

June 7, 2005

iTunes and DRM

While iTunes are opening stores all over the world and contributing to the downloading of music from the internet for a small fee, they are also limiting the use of the downloaded files by usind Digital Rights Management (DRM)

“DRM systems restrict the use of digital files in order to protect the interests of copyright holders. DRM technologies can control file access (number of views, length of views), altering, sharing, copying, printing, and saving. These technologies may be contained within the operating system, program software, or in the actual hardware of a device.”quote from www.epic.org

When you download a file from iTunes online store and store it in your iTunes program on your computer it will become a DRM file, and that means that you can only play your file in your iTunes player or you iPod. The file is not a DRM file when you download it, but becomes one when you put it in your iTune. So you may say that you don’t have to put in iTunes, but the music you download from iTunes online store is not mp3 it’s acc which only works on iTunes…

The Apple webpage have renamed DRM to FairPlay and tell us:
“The iTunes Music Store uses FairPlay, Apple’s digital rights management system that’s designed to be fair to the artist, to the record companies and to you. In a nutshell, your FairPlay agreement entitles you to play your music on up to five computers (and enjoy unlimited synching with iPods), allows unlimited burning for individual songs and lets you burn playlists up to 7 times each. ”

But the DRM isn’t FairPlay as apple claims;

“DRM Systems Cannot Recognize Fair Use Rights

Statutory and Common Law interpretations of copyright law afford individuals “Fair Use” rights. Fair Use provides a defense to individuals who engage in an unauthorized use of protected content. It is impossible for DRM systems to incorporate Fair Use principles because they are difficult to define, and evolve over time. Fred von Lohmann of the Electronic Frontier Foundation has argued that for DRM to recognize Fair Use, engineers must be able to program a federal judge onto a computer chip.

Fair Use allows individuals to interact with content to promote cultural production, learning, innovation, and equity between content owners and consumers. Fair Use includes libraries’ and educators’ rights to provide content to users, the right to sell physical copies of certain content that one acquires lawfully (the “First Sale” doctrine), and the ability to make a backup copy of software and music. No DRM scheme developed affords users these rights. “quote from www.epic.org

People that are Mac lovers, would probably not have a problem with this. However, I as a neutral in the war between PC and Mac don’t like it at all. I think that DRM is more damaging than it is protecting it’s content. Richard Stallman has discribed the horror that may be our future if Apple and DRM are allowed to contiune develop their copyright systems;

“For Dan Halbert, the road to Tycho began in college–when Lissa Lenz asked to borrow his computer. Hers had broken down, and unless she could borrow another, she would fail her midterm project. There was no one she dared ask, except Dan.

This put Dan in a dilemma. He had to help her–but if he lent her his computer, she might read his books. Aside from the fact that you could go to prison for many years for letting someone else read your books, the very idea shocked him at first. Like everyone, he had been taught since elementary school that sharing books was nasty and wrong–something that only pirates would do.” from the book The Right to read.

May 19, 2005

The Golden Generation

butch.blogsome.com

My mate Butch consider himself a part of Generation Y and grew up with that idea. I don’t consider my self a part of Generation Y, even if I sadly am. For Butch Generation Y is someone how has grown up with the ideas of equal rights as norm. Butch also claims:

“However we have also only ever known,Terrorism, Heavy Metal, Rap, AIDS and STD’s, CD’s, Computers, and its in the latter in which we make our move.”

Even if I don’t totally agree with that, I do see his point.

For me Generation Y is the generation of lazy slobs who just live of their partents and have no national feeling or pride towards their country.

As I understand, Baby boomers grew up after the World War 2 and were children of those that had to build their country up after a horrible war, and they learned the value of work hard. Generation X was got born because of the slogan: “make love! not war!”, in a world full of perfect ideals of flowerpower and freedom of speech. Then Generation Y comes along, and they are born because of an economical boom in the western world, a financial optimism. They can just harvest from everything that have been done by the generations before them, they sit on their bums and complains about everything and anything, nothing is ever good enough and they would rather get money for doing nothing instead of a hard days work. Generation Y wants all the new gadgets and high tech stuff, like the ipod and the 3G mobiles, which has turned our society into a consumer based society. Generation Y loves to shop. (However there are exceptions..)

I would rather see myself as the Golden Generation, as it is called in Norway (born 1980-1985 during and right after Norway became an oil nation). We have all the possibilties in the world, we can travel, learn languages and can use technology that didn’t even excist ten years ago. And it’s all up to us to exploid and to use all this to our advantage. I like to think I’m a part of the Golden Generation that is using my options, not Generation Y that is wondering how I’m going to get money when my dad stops paying my creditcards. We have to change the direction that Generation Y, we have to use the advantage we have been given.

And by the way Butch, you say; Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, the Simpsons and Nirvana

I have to say; He-Man, South Park and Michael Jackson (even if that is not political correct at the moment)

March 15, 2005

Research project for Media Context

I just want to blog the feedback and ideas that I got from my clas during our Media Context session in week 4. It was most helpful, so thanks everyone, if anyone have more question or inputs please comment on this blog.

- Title: How will the introduction of PVR (Personal Video Recorder) influence television production?

- Explain the consept of PVR

- Have a look if the TiVo (Brand name for a PVR in the US) has change things in America the last couple of years, and how well used it is. Joni also mentioned that TiVo has to be subscribed to, as you would subscribe to cable television.

- Don’t think it is available in Australia yet, but have to have a look into that. Someone mentioned that Foxtel might already have introduced it. What are the possibilities for PVR in Australia and what kind of attidudes are out there.

- Compare ABC to Seven, Nine and Ten. How will it effect commercial television compared to goverment founded television.

- Then the big question: what will happend to the ads? Will it decrease the amount of money the commercial television gets from advertising or will productplacement replace that gap? Will people be able to avoid all unwanted advertising or can the stations get a way around the technology?

- How will it effect what kind of programming that will be produced for television. Will it give way for Live shows with interactivity to make people participate in the show and in that way prevent them from recording the program?

- How will it effect the market for DVD’s ? What about the Panasonic DVD recorder with a hard disk? What about copyright, when it is so easy to share, how will that be prevented?

- PVR on mobile phones?

Aspects

- Economical: Will it effect the founding for commercial televsion?
- Social: Will it give the viewer the freedom to watch whatever whenever they want.
-Political: What kind of laws will be used to prevent sharing and burning of programming onto DVD’s?
-Enviromental: Less plastic..? (thanks for that one Rupert!)

Comments wanted…